From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e8d2c0ed82daf4da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Handling Addressing Errors Date: 1999/03/21 Message-ID: <7d1ije$c7g$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 457055548 References: <1999Mar3.212443.1898@nosc.mil> <7bm0v3$933$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <1999Mar18.005620.19189@nosc.mil> <7cttko$348$1@plug.news.pipex.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x15.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Mar 21 01:38:55 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-03-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7cttko$348$1@plug.news.pipex.net>, "Nick Roberts" wrote: > I think Charles' query with the RM95 is largely addressed > by the AARM, if I > may quote AARM C.6: You may quote the AARM, but please remember that it has no official status whatsoever, it is simply some informal comments by the designers and writers of the RM. It may be useful in some cases to infer intent, but it has no official normative status. In other words, if the RM is unclear, and the AARM is clear, then the language definition is still unclear! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own