From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_WORDY,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e8d2c0ed82daf4da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: Handling Addressing Errors
Date: 1999/03/19
Message-ID: <7cv0no$dvk$1@plug.news.pipex.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 456749718
References: <1999Mar3.212443.1898@nosc.mil> <7bm0v3$933$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <1999Mar18.005620.19189@nosc.mil> <36F17DAC.E80F01DD@averstar.com>
 <36F21863.7D71@iki.fi>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: UUNET WorldCom server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNET
 WorldCom)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mikko Levanto wrote in message <36F21863.7D71@iki.fi>...
[...]
|Can optimization affect the number of accesses ?

No.

|E.g., if A is volatile, does
|
|   A := A + A;
|
|always cause two reads and one write?


Yes it does (or else you have a really nasty compiler).

|Mikko J. Levanto
|mailto:mikko.levanto@vtt.fi

-------------------------------------
Nick Roberts
-------------------------------------