From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9afe16648c0a7435
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Larry <lhazel@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Problem Compiling with GNAT
Date: 1999/03/15
Message-ID: <7cjm4g$avo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 455303486
References: <7cj6nt$rvh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <m3sob6broj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x14.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 136.205.149.47
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Mar 15 19:13:30 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
Date: 1999-03-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <m3sob6broj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>,
  Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> Larry <lhazel@mindspring.com> writes:
>
> > There is a type named Class in many packages and in one procedure the
> > compiler seems to be confused about which Class is used.  Here is
> > abbreviated code for that procedure:
>
> "Class" is a horrible choice for the name of a type.  Why don't you just
> name the type "Fire_Mission"?
>
I agree.  I inherited this code, don't understand it yet, and am trying to get
as much of it to compile as possible with minimum changes.  Actually,
Fire_Mission is the name of one package in which a type Class is defined.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own