From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.228.76 with SMTP id o73mr1962374ith.32.1510850047588; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:34:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.42.99 with SMTP id t90mr96314ota.5.1510850047466; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:34:07 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.kjsl.com!usenet.stanford.edu!d140no372200itd.0!news-out.google.com!193ni843iti.0!nntp.google.com!i6no262511itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:34:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1510416187.30535.107.camel@obry.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.128.94.130; posting-account=XYi0owoAAAC_eOHXu2MQKhBYUNiEUxE2 NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.128.94.130 References: <7b34a80f-00cf-406e-b99e-a8c8b8f4ad1f@googlegroups.com> <8cca1136-b15a-4528-82c5-3505e2416915@googlegroups.com> <1510416187.30535.107.camel@obry.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7c73f1a2-f680-4331-bd6f-ae0a55c267dc@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: why is ada better than forth haskell lisp swi prolog and pharo? From: "Ingo M." Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:34:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48935 Date: 2017-11-16T08:34:07-08:00 List-Id: Am Samstag, 11. November 2017 17:03:10 UTC+1 schrieb Pascal Obry: > I understand the ":)" but yet this is far from true. SPARK is built in > Ada, only a prover is in OCaml. I did not mention the issue to mock Spark. Actually, I think Ada and Spark = belong to the best languages ever since Ada/Spark code is practical, well r= eadable, and very maintainable. I just want to point out that the requireme= nt of OCaml could lead newcomers who are interested in Ada and Spark to the= impression that OCaml was chosen because Spark (which provides verificatio= n as essential part of the language!) is not qualified to do OCaml's job.