From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a993df02f6d82f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: More questions... Date: 1999/03/10 Message-ID: <7c4icm$gnk$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 453195430 References: <7bvb4j$lt0$1@remarQ.com> <7c40uu$14lu@news3.newsguy.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x8.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Mar 10 01:37:27 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-03-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7c40uu$14lu@news3.newsguy.com>, Samuel Mize wrote: > Was he saying that Finalize should be used sparingly > compared to C++ destructors? No, he was not :-) > > I would assume that he was saying it should not be used > unless needed, because it adds a function call at every > assignment statement, and when the variable goes out of > scope. That's what he was saying! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own