From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1388:: with SMTP id
 8-v6mr5506359iot.129.1526640248813;
        Fri, 18 May 2018 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:620d:: with SMTP id g13-v6mr134968otj.3.1526640248171;
 Fri, 18 May 2018 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v8-v6no1490954itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni1750itb.0!nntp.google.com!v8-v6no1490950itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 03:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87bmddshod.fsf@nightsong.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <6420bab2-0aef-4d36-b978-525e4de45e7e@googlegroups.com>
 <aed23075-1271-4e2c-b5f2-8da705e1a73e@googlegroups.com>
 <a86dc533-a8f5-4d1c-9b4c-11d7963c6d15@googlegroups.com>
 <pdkrvk$n53$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <1559505943.548291689.457576.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <87fu2psqpj.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <300fd624-72a0-4171-90dc-49ad5df4fa21@googlegroups.com>
 <87bmddshod.fsf@nightsong.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7c18f8d5-a054-4c81-b15a-0250d1fb1d46@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: meaningfully/compellingly "advertising" Ada on StackOverflow
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:44:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52424
Date: 2018-05-18T03:44:07-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 18 May 2018 05:37:26 UTC+1, Paul Rubin  wrote:

> I like Dan'l Miller's suggestion of having two Ada benchmarks, giving
> both the safe and unsafe measurements.  Then people can decide what's
> relevant to their own requirements.  Giving just the unsafe measurements
> is uninformative or maybe even misleading.

I think it would be better to have multiple implementations showing differe=
nt levels of safety added tot he original and then one using the standard c=
ontainer, maybe one using the traits containers. Then people can get an ide=
a of what slows what down and where.