From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,772ae8afc5db35f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Abstract Subprograms of Untagged Types Date: 1999/03/06 Message-ID: <7bprch$lce$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 451729689 References: <7bk6gh$6d9$2@plug.news.pipex.net> <7bmgfd$2d3$3@plug.news.pipex.net> <7bp8bk$flc$1@plug.news.pipex.net> <36E04AA7.4CB8F686@averstar.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x6.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Mar 06 00:03:34 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-03-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <36E04AA7.4CB8F686@averstar.com>, Tucker Taft wrote: > At this point, this seems very unlikely, since someone > may be quite happily taking advantage of the ability to > declare abstract primitives of an untagged type. This is indeed a critical feature, and one that was specifically discussed during the design. It is definitely used and useful! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own