From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,35ce1c7836290812
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: SGI GNAT Question? (Long)
Date: 1999/03/04
Message-ID: <7bmbne$j2h$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 451183086
References: <7bflkk$78i$1@news.ro.com> <7bhlb2$h4n$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <7bia5u$3lt$1@news.ro.com> <7bkasm$rlt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <36DE8585.2B5E6A5C@spam.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x8.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Mar 04 16:18:02 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-03-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <36DE8585.2B5E6A5C@spam.com>,
  spamwithchipsplease@spam.com wrote:
>
> Am I write in presuming that the commerical version came first, since if
> the GPL version came first, then commercial version being a modification
> would be covered by the GPL and anyone obtaining the 3.11b2 version would
> be free to re-distribute it provided they  extended the same GPL rights to
> their distribution. Or did ACT develope two Ada95 compilers behind chinese
> walls ?

If you are asking if the compiler you have is covered by the GPL, that should
be easy to determine from your distribution. Just check the licensing
agreement!

T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own