From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,28db79a4b238c104 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: What's wrong with this simple Ada w/ assembly code? Date: 1999/03/04 Message-ID: <7bm0nq$90j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 451130579 References: <36ddb9aa.0@silver.truman.edu> <36de1e0e.43769384@news.pacbell.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x15.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Mar 04 13:10:23 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-03-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <36de1e0e.43769384@news.pacbell.net>, tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) wrote: > Unfortunately, this is compiler-specific. I'd hazard a > guess that Gnat would be happy with the GNU assembler. The guess is true but irrelevant, GNAT could not care less what compiler or assembler is used provided that the standard system ABI is properly followed. It is hard to believe that this is not pretty standard *across* compilers! If you are writing an assembler module, as opposed to trying to use System.Machine_Code, then your solution, if done properly should in fact be pretty portable across compilers. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own