From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,772ae8afc5db35f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Can't export object of private type
Date: 1999/03/03
Message-ID: <7bkamt$rh1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 450891652
References: <7be5ap$dh0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <F80B6B.29J@syd.csa.com.au>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x8.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Mar 03 21:48:17 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-03-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <F80B6B.29J@syd.csa.com.au>,
  nospam@thanks.com.au wrote:
> Yes, it's an informal definition, but one that you ought
> to be able to comprehend.

Sorry, I can comprehend the vague thought behind it, but
no, I can't comprehend the precise technical intention,
because I don't believe it is consistent, or can be made
consistent.

If I say I don't see anyway to define something, and you
offer a vague thought that you would like to see it defined
anyway, that does not help me complete the definition.

Yes, we know the general thought here, but the devil is
in the details, as the saying goes, and I see no way of
dealing with these details.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own