From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,98ad5b2a2cd88a53 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,98ad5b2a2cd88a53 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Ada or C++ acting 'correctly' here? Date: 1999/03/02 Message-ID: <7bhlg0$h5v$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 450484912 References: <7b8c7u$sj1@drn.newsguy.com> <7bg0pc$5a4$1@ffx2nh3.news.uu.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x7.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Mar 02 21:33:53 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-03-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7bg0pc$5a4$1@ffx2nh3.news.uu.net>, "Willliam V" wrote: > So the Ada compiler you are using is > relying very heavily on the underlying C machinery. Don't > be too fast to blame C or C++ > Wil This is most certainly completely wrong, but it is hard to understand the misconception that leads to this incorrect statement, so it is hard to comment in any detail! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own