From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,35ce1c7836290812 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Mize Subject: Re: GNAT discussions should be here as well. Date: 1999/03/02 Message-ID: <7bh11u$1ibb@news3.newsguy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 450412447 References: <7bflkk$78i$1@news.ro.com> <7bgmqm$82v@drn.newsguy.com> Organization: ImagiNet Communications, Ltd. User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-981002 ("Phobia") (UNIX) (AIX/3-2) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: kvisko@ wrote: > In article , "David says... >> >>In your lengthy message (which might have better been submitted to >>chat@gnat.com), > > Why? Simply because a lot of GNAT users pay attention to that mailing list, but don't read comp.lang.ada. He wasn't saying "you bad boy," he was just pointing you at a resource where you were more likely to get help. > All public Ada discussions should be done here, on any topic, any one can > simply ignore threads they are not interested in. Why are the Ada people > so up-tight about these things? Why are you characterizing someone as "up-tight about these things" on the basis of two words in a post that was trying to help you, and continuing the discussion you started, right here in this forum? Best, Sam Mize -- Samuel Mize -- smize@imagin.net (home email) -- Team Ada Fight Spam: see http://www.cauce.org/ \\\ Smert Spamonam