From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,efc9f994d31d0d5e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Limited initialization for non-limited types
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <7bf04295-7e24-47da-b1c9-cbc67aa366d8@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <b481036a-41ee-4fc5-a0d0-c73cfef60234@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<fsehsr$40g$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <05336885-5b45-4b2d-b27c-733c2002ca58@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
	<fsi4qg$7m4$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <8ce4085b-08c9-4f3b-9909-3a68b8832194@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<fsjpdt$16p$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.57.218
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206747424 31479 127.0.0.1 (28 Mar 2008 23:37:04
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:37:04 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.70.57.218;
	posting-account=5RIiTwoAAACt_Eu87gmPAJMoMTeMz-rn
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.12)
	Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20623
Date: 2008-03-28T16:37:04-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 28, 3:53 pm, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> The other thing I was thinking was that you might be better served by
> wrapping your trace object access in a (second) controlled object.

I had already done that.  The testing objects use both a trace and a
variable name: a trace to record (interleaved) events and a name to
distinguish between their disparate origins.  Since the trace is
shared, it needed a handle/body implementation.

> You'd probably need an access
> discriminant somewhere to provide access to the parent object.

As of yet, I haven't needed that, since the trace is only a receiver
of event entries.

Eric