From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cef1e23795181e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Alternate to Unchecked_Conversion - Portable? Date: 1999/02/28 Message-ID: <7bafhq$k4a$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 449797095 References: <36d05e39.0@news.pacifier.com> <36d2638e.6427631@nntp.concentric.net> <7avpi0$jke$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36d3ba85.713118@nntp.concentric.net> <7b2l6s$vu3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36d50d18.695962@nntp.concentric.net> <7b3glh$ml6$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x9.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 166.72.82.111 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Feb 28 04:09:35 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-28T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com writes: > > > A mantra that should be central to every programmer's > > view of the universe is: > > > > "just because it works does not mean it is right" > > > > A lot of programmers violate this because they don't > > know enough to avoid violations. > > And the rest of us violate this by accident. > Good point! Indeed a common error is to write a program with a "latent bug" that does not cause the program to fail now, but can fause a failure later. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own