From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,184737148aef02ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: A Modest Defense of ACT (though they are big boys and can take
 care of themselves)
Date: 1999/02/26
Message-ID: <7b6t9u$oag$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 448809787
References: <78sojm$crk$1@plug.news.pipex.net>
 <F6BzAA.KKI.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <7982p7$nll$1@plug.news.pipex.net>
 <87aeyv4kbg.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <79asc3$cq3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <79c2ch$j1c$1@remarQ.com> <79ckt6$rp3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <7ah65p$4ag$1@remarQ.com> <36CF00DB.43DF428C@lmco.com>
 <7arqt6$3ef$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36D41563.D8A72F6B@lmco.com>
 <7b4c0a$gmu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36D6B701.6DDB0997@lmco.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x2.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Feb 26 19:39:43 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-02-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <36D6B701.6DDB0997@lmco.com>,
  Steve Quinlan <steven.quinlan@lmco.com> wrote:
> That was a rather glowing endorsement. So, why were  you choking in the
previous
> note?

It was a specific point I choked on, not your whole posting. You'll note I
only quoted one sentence in the whole posting.

I don't think this is even a contraversial issue. You must have noticed that
Robert misses no oppertunity to point out that "unsupported" users can expect
no consideration whatsoever.

T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own