From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,772ae8afc5db35f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Can't export object of private type Date: 1999/02/26 Message-ID: <7b6coq$89u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 448717954 References: <7b3f6v$lc1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7b5u87$s88$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x2.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Feb 26 14:57:35 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-02-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7b5u87$s88$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com wrote: > compartmentalization. Indeed we have on the drawing boards > for GNAT a feature to have the private parts in separate > files which will be very handy for target specialization > and indeed for general abstraction. An intriguing idea. Will this separation be required, or just allowed? T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own