From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.182.102.40 with SMTP id fl8mr5102570obb.31.1453501618242; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:26:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.112.202 with SMTP id is10mr103641obb.7.1453501618219; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:26:58 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.213.216.MISMATCH!h5no8143473igh.0!news-out.google.com!kr2ni6334igb.0!nntp.google.com!h5no8143471igh.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:26:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5056e887-d511-4926-8a4a-c093f44e3e25@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.119.168.92; posting-account=O3LyFwoAAACc1uh60ZcOUmAGdDmGsEcV NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.119.168.92 References: <31402e8a-3d66-4b0b-b7ad-5bb34b17aa5e@googlegroups.com> <5056e887-d511-4926-8a4a-c093f44e3e25@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7b506658-c66b-49ad-bdee-4474109015d1@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: IoT / IIoT stuff From: slos Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 22:26:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29204 Date: 2016-01-22T14:26:58-08:00 List-Id: Le vendredi 22 janvier 2016 12:48:24 UTC+1, Maciej Sobczak a =E9crit=A0: > > The next big thing is marketed as Internet of Things and Industrial Int= ernet of Things >=20 >> There is nothing "next" in this, especially if you are looking for commu= nication solutions. These things have been solved in '80s and since then on= ly variations of selected features have been developed. >=20 For sure nothing has changed after Babbage, Turing or Von Neumann... ;-) In the 80's TCP/IP was already there but not Internet as it is now with eve= ryone having a PC or a Smartphone. With many challenges still to solve. =20 > If you are looking for something that is Ada-friendly and that can be als= o used with small embedded devices, then have a look at YAMI4: >=20 > http://www.inspirel.com/yami4/ >=20 Thank you for the link. I have found interesting things there. > You will also certainly find PolyORB being mentioned in the Ada ecosystem= , but I'm not sure if it fits the IoT hype due to the memory and computing = resources found on many network-enabled embedded devices. The "new" part of= IoT is "T" and many of the existing solutions just do not fit. Not all IoT devices need to be constrained. Gateways can exist and abstract= a network of legacy devices for example. >=20 > --=20 > Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com