From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f8544883f4f8ab29
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes.
Date: 1999/02/25
Message-ID: <7b47q2$cnd$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 448397800
References: <36D3A1EF.E7CA2A8C@physics.BLAH.purdue.BLAH.edu>
 <7b2mpq$194$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x7.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Feb 25 19:20:45 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-02-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <7b2mpq$194$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
  dewar@gnat.com wrote:

> For one thing, it would be interesting to see if different
> compilers implementing Annex E could really communicate :-)

Are they supposed to be able to? That would indeed be very cool, but I didn't
get that impression reading the annex myself.

T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own