From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd3a5ba6349a6060 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: should I be interested in ada? Date: 1999/02/22 Message-ID: <7arod3$17l$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 447061379 References: <7a72e6$g55$1@probity.mcc.ac.uk> <01be5cd6$9c593000$b132e8c3@hup-pc> <7aniep$mam$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x14.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Feb 22 14:08:42 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-02-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7aniep$mam$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, dewar@gnat.com wrote: > P.S. this is a bit close to an ad, I know, but it seemed > appropriate to respond to the Rational post, which was > also a bit close. The distinction between information and > advertisements is not always clear! Perhaps we should have Considering the question was about compiler availablity, I don't think such a response is out of bounds at all. T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own