From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bcced006b4956bd6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: How to modify Standard types in GNAT-3.11?
Date: 1999/02/19
Message-ID: <7aijsf$j39$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 445915973
References: <7afo84$fgm$1@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca> <uiuczpcyy.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x15.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Feb 19 02:56:19 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-02-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <uiuczpcyy.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>,
  Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote:
> tonya@aban.ece.ubc.ca (Tony R. Ambardar) writes:
>
> Since you are recompiling the run-time, you can certainly
> edit any file you want. However, it would be better to
> simply delete Long_long_Float, since you won't support
> it. Don't lie and make it not
> bigger than Long_Float!

Bad idea! Stephen, I guess you are not that familiar with
the GNAT run-time library. Long_Long_Float is used in many
many units, and indeed the expected thing is that it be
equivalent to Long_Float if IEEE extended is not supported.
Even doing this equivalence is not so easy!

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own