From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FROM_WORDY,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f4e8127f6a9fd3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: Renaming entries?
Date: 1999/02/17
Message-ID: <7afc1p$3mi$3@plug.news.pipex.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 445455830
References: <7aelgt$2hr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: UUNET WorldCom server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNET
 WorldCom)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Right, [what is the 'T' of T.E.D. btw?], I've got this one pinned, I reckon.
RM95 8.5.4 (5) says that "the profile of a renaming-as-body shall be subtype
conformant with that of the renamed callable entity." RM 6.3.1 (2, 13) says
that the default calling convention for an entry is 'Entry'. Paragraph (17)
says that for subtype conformance the conventions must be the same.

So, the solution to your problem is to use

   pragma Convention(Entry,Fred);

in the package specification, and all will be well.

Now all I need is a spiral-bound RM that doesn't keep ON CLOSING ITSELF
ARGHHHHH! Sorry, calmed down now. I'm gonna break the spine of this damn
thing. Feeling lucky, book? Go on, make my day.

-------------------------------------
Nick Roberts

'The time has come,' the Walrus said,
  'To talk of many things:
Of shoes--of ships--and sealing wax--
  Of cabbages--and kings--
And why the sea is boiling hot--
  And whether pigs have wings.'
                        Lewis Carroll
          "Through the Looking Glass"
-------------------------------------