From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cb2525ffbfe23ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Why both "with" and "use"? Date: 1999/02/17 Message-ID: <7aejjv$tj$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 445312613 References: <36C5B28C.F32C43A4@jps.net> <7acj53$1vu@news3.newsguy.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x15.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Feb 17 14:27:21 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7acj53$1vu@news3.newsguy.com>, Samuel Mize wrote: > Overall, I'd just prefer that a "use" statement in a context clause > implied the corresponding "with" statement. Hmmm. Would a "use type" clause also imply a "with"? Would a "use" for a child imply a "with" of its parents? T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own