From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
MSGID_RANDY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,67ca96c42837a9ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pascal Obry"
Subject: Re: Getting GNAT to issue ARM error messages
Date: 1999/02/17
Message-ID: <7adt6i$71j$1@cf01.edf.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 445247448
References: <79oj1f$e8p$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
<1999Feb10.073547.1@eisner> <7a1a9i$2kq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
<36C47579.3D0CAFCB@averstar.com> <7a490k$snr$1@plug.news.pipex.net>
<7a5b71$d25$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7a7aat$mse$1@plug.news.pipex.net>
<7a86hj$ka1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
<36C9C0BC.EA9C114E@lmco.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: EDF
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id:
steve quinlan a �crit dans le message <36C9C0BC.EA9C114E@lmco.com>...
>You will never change Robert's mind on this. To my mind the flaw is in
>thinking that a bunch of Ada experts can determine whether in any given
case
>users (which users?) would find RM references useful. I don't think they
can
>reliably.
>
>I had this same argument with him when I was doing a compiler trade study
(we
>picked GNAT anyway, but this did get counted against it). Even if we can't
>change his mind, the fact that overwhelmingly users want this seems like it
>should move ACT to be more responsive. But they know best what we need to
>correct our errors. (;-)
>
The good news is that you can download GNAT sources and add this feature
yourself :-)
Pascal.