From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,67ca96c42837a9ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pascal Obry" Subject: Re: Getting GNAT to issue ARM error messages Date: 1999/02/17 Message-ID: <7adt6i$71j$1@cf01.edf.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 445247448 References: <79oj1f$e8p$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <1999Feb10.073547.1@eisner> <7a1a9i$2kq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36C47579.3D0CAFCB@averstar.com> <7a490k$snr$1@plug.news.pipex.net> <7a5b71$d25$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7a7aat$mse$1@plug.news.pipex.net> <7a86hj$ka1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36C9C0BC.EA9C114E@lmco.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Organization: EDF Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: steve quinlan a �crit dans le message <36C9C0BC.EA9C114E@lmco.com>... >You will never change Robert's mind on this. To my mind the flaw is in >thinking that a bunch of Ada experts can determine whether in any given case >users (which users?) would find RM references useful. I don't think they can >reliably. > >I had this same argument with him when I was doing a compiler trade study (we >picked GNAT anyway, but this did get counted against it). Even if we can't >change his mind, the fact that overwhelmingly users want this seems like it >should move ACT to be more responsive. But they know best what we need to >correct our errors. (;-) > The good news is that you can download GNAT sources and add this feature yourself :-) Pascal.