From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.25.200 with SMTP id b191mr17845808itb.11.1516294121893; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:48:41 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.32.68 with SMTP id n62mr245557ota.6.1516294121792; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:48:41 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g80no332591itg.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni1089ita.0!nntp.google.com!w142no332533ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:48:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2c7bd6af-5eb8-415b-8808-e8d85c0c4d99@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:c7:83cd:ca3c:2879:9590:665d:f828; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83cd:ca3c:2879:9590:665d:f828 References: <7e895632-e0f9-4035-a0a3-1a31a262c8b3@googlegroups.com> <6e4679ff-6058-40ec-821a-791507313906@googlegroups.com> <59f84cc1-3d46-43be-9f0a-618569caf5ee@googlegroups.com> <2c7bd6af-5eb8-415b-8808-e8d85c0c4d99@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7a87c81e-3740-4cad-9cad-e4c627304ea9@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: ADA.STRINGS.INDEX_ERROR : a-strunb.adb:782 From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:48:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 2026 X-Received-Body-CRC: 379430642 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49984 Date: 2018-01-18T08:48:41-08:00 List-Id: Am Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 15:17:05 UTC+1 schrieb Mehdi Saada: > Since universal_integer is meant to be compatible with everything, and since Ada83 is long gone, > could "function Length return Integer renames Object_Array'Length" be accepted now ? I don't think it could break any existing code to accept something that wasn't. There's still lots of Ada 83 code around in the embedded world. And Ada 95 didn't abolish universal_integer. Please dive into the very heart of the definition of numeric types in Ada before you claim such nonsense.