From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,67ca96c42837a9ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Getting GNAT to issue ARM error messages Date: 1999/02/14 Message-ID: <7a5akr$cil$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 444132868 References: <79oj1f$e8p$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <1999Feb10.073547.1@eisner> <7a1a9i$2kq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36C47579.3D0CAFCB@averstar.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x8.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Feb 14 01:58:55 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-02-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <36C47579.3D0CAFCB@averstar.com>, Tucker Taft wrote: > Personally, I wish we had > the best of both ;-), and I suspect all compilers are in > fact converging on better error messages, and judicious > use of RM references. Just to be absolutely clear, the GNAT philosophy is to add RM references wherever they are helpful. However, we have not found very many such cases! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own