From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a02:c807:: with SMTP id p7mr50566286jao.38.1558370274151; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:37:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:71d1:: with SMTP id z17mr18771982otj.22.1558370273963; Mon, 20 May 2019 09:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u76no27022ita.0!news-out.google.com!l135ni47itc.0!nntp.google.com!u76no27017ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:37:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2607:f2c0:9212:d500:49fd:b2f8:9a69:5c50; posting-account=XGBE5QoAAABsRez5Xjd0KD5FXhbiCPL- NNTP-Posting-Host: 2607:f2c0:9212:d500:49fd:b2f8:9a69:5c50 References: <100ad407-090e-4316-9746-a4469568b53e@googlegroups.com> <477352cf-80d0-458c-b64a-4605557fef8f@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7a5a923d-f6a1-4ad5-86af-8c926310b754@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada to Ada Translator ? From: foo wong Injection-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:37:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56345 Date: 2019-05-20T09:37:53-07:00 List-Id: Hi Optikos Thanks for all your great posts and help. So with the Ada-Yacc/Flex, we are Berkley licensed and that's it. However i= f I started tearing out pieces from gnat 3.14, the generated code could con= tain GMGPL code taken from it(Likely after a lot of modification). Let's say I wanted to implement nested sub-programs, gnat must have trampol= ines or something in there. I could rip these out without having to write t= hem. This would mean that the generated code would have to be GMGPL too. If I didn't do this, everything could be BSD but then I would have to write= everything from scratch and that could take quite a lot of time. BTW, another plus with this, if gnat is not linking in any runtime, and the= runtime was created by the source-to-source preprocessor, all of the targe= ts that gcc supports would be possible as long as the preprocessor was able= to generator the right support before it reached gnat. =20 -Patrick