From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,355f90547d1b4b5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: PRECOMPILATION
Date: 1999/02/10
Message-ID: <79qs48$f9s$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 442639659
References: <918556681.260459@dedale.pandemonium.fr>
 <1999Feb9.081125.1@eisner> <36C08503.510FE86B@magic.fr>
 <36c0b371.307347@news.pacbell.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x13.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Feb 10 02:49:47 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-02-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <36c0b371.307347@news.pacbell.net>,
  tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran) wrote:
> >AFAIK aonix is the only compiler which swaps fields in a
> record. I think Rational Apex also optimizes record
> layout unless you overide with a rep clause.

Our view from the GNAT world is that such rearrangement
of fields causes much more trouble than it is worth, and
we quite definitely do NOT do such rearrangement!

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own