From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,956e1c708fea1c33 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: Looking for implementation idea Date: 1999/02/08 Message-ID: <79n76h$9km$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 441871049 References: <79n2dt$5n9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x13.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Feb 08 17:34:09 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-02-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <79n2dt$5n9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, dennison@telepath.com wrote: > They look to me like they were *designed* to be usable > for synchronization in a parallel shared-memory > architecture. Was that actually the case? To be fair they were really designed for bare board single processor use, hence some of the restrictions. But of course they are usable for the purpose you mention! -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own