From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Y2.1K (was: Ada vs C++ vs Java)
Date: 1999/02/05
Message-ID: <79fm7n$fil$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 441108797
References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net> <369CBAED.20BE91CA@pwfl.com>
 <369CF2EF.AC875B2A@gecm.com> <78i6m1$505$3@plug.news.pipex.net>
 <wcc3e4k7lev.fsf@world.std.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x13.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Feb 05 21:01:50 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-02-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <wcc3e4k7lev.fsf@world.std.com>,
  Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com> wrote:
> "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com> writes:
> Of course, this thing is no longer an Ada implementation.
> I wouldn't want to sign the Delaration of Conformance
> after having so deliberately disobeyed the standard!

So just put in a compiler option saying whether or not
to restrict the range.

Please don't imply that the ACVC or the DoC is such a
strait jacket when it is not!

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own