From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.46.8 with SMTP id q8mr32554396yhb.0.1420457890156; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 03:38:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.211.112 with SMTP id nb16mr9316obc.18.1420457890016; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 03:38:10 -0800 (PST) Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!bm13no3355934qab.0!news-out.google.com!h6ni14890igv.0!nntp.google.com!h15no21263972igd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 03:38:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.46.72.234; posting-account=yiWntAoAAAC1KqC_shmxJYv07B9l6LNU NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.46.72.234 References: <0Kgqw.953330$_k.685364@fx16.iad> <199c826a-923e-497f-a8e2-9e732c8a5665@googlegroups.com> <87bnmetex4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4ae7f0d5-d681-4be9-95bc-b5e789b3ad40@googlegroups.com> <87tx06rve6.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87lhlirpk0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <79f3eff7-2b45-40ae-af94-fa9a17426d82@googlegroups.com> Subject: GNAT GPL is not shareware (was: Re: What is the best license to use for open source software?) From: David Botton Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:38:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:191666 Date: 2015-01-05T03:38:09-08:00 List-Id: Demos are usually fully featured and the issue is the impression others wil= l have of the availability of Ada. If the impressionion is Ada is available= only for open source or high end niche that leaves most of the world in th= e middle. That is not Ada advocacy that is harmful. David Botton