From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.70.22 with SMTP id t22mr5932198ioa.8.1505077762248;
        Sun, 10 Sep 2017 14:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.36.250.140 with SMTP id v134mr468358ith.0.1505077762227;
 Sun, 10 Sep 2017 14:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!o200no1905057itg.0!news-out.google.com!c139ni2942itb.0!nntp.google.com!o200no1905052itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 14:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <oov4nf$am6$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=83.255.112.230;
 posting-account=NT38RwoAAAB4_OO_uw8yHtNaa9Hkjukk
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.255.112.230
References: <oludae$seh$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <4dc188de-802b-41ad-9cdd-b8246eb9a1c7@googlegroups.com>
 <47cc6474-8b75-4644-92d0-bd1f694c20e7@googlegroups.com>
 <338b355a-dee4-4c73-b00e-09d9a8430fb1@googlegroups.com>
 <ooflve$ukd$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <e9e2556d-9b23-4e7f-9058-776dd506f73c@googlegroups.com>
 <ooposs$5o1$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <21692daf-5a52-43f0-a72a-d79e6a7dcc9f@googlegroups.com>
 <oov4nf$am6$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <79e3056e-647f-44f4-8dcc-029bb440165e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Community Input for the Maintenance and Revision of the Ada
 Programming Language
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW4gU8O2ZGVybGluZCDDhXN0csO2bQ==?= <johaa1993@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 21:09:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48008
Date: 2017-09-10T14:09:21-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> No, A (I) + B (I) is less simple, because it doesn't mean A (I) + B (I), it 
> really means Real_A (Real_A'First + I) + Real_B (Real_B'First + I), and the 
> reader has to remember that to understand what the code is doing. The more the 
> reader has to remember, the greater the cognitive load of the code, and a 
> significant part of S/W engineering is aimed at reducing the cognitive load. If 
> you write Real_A (Real_A'First + I) + Real_B (Real_B'First + I) then the code 
> actually does what it says and you haven't increased the cognitive load.

Yes you are right. Algorithms has to be taught in the Ada realm.