From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,effb80d4bb7716dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Pat Rogers" Subject: Re: Wanted: Ada STL. Reward: Ada's Future Date: 1999/02/04 Message-ID: <79d0db$6h5$1@remarQ.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 440725608 References: <790f4q$3l@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net> <36B856E4.D921C1D@bton.ac.uk> <79cc3q$mms$1@remarQ.com> <1999Feb4.141530.1@eisner> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com X-Trace: 918160619 Y6JRGRJUHF617C640C usenet58.supernews.com Organization: Software Arts & Sciences Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Larry Kilgallen wrote in message <1999Feb4.141530.1@eisner>... >In article <79cc3q$mms$1@remarQ.com>, "Pat Rogers" writes: > >> Why not have the Ada community "standardize" on the the free Ada 95 >> Booch Components? Specifically, expanding them after the core from >> the C++ version is completed? > >Because the variety of meanings of the word "free" covers some things >that cannot be included in commercial software. At some point it is >easier to reinvent the wheel than to spend life pretending to be a >lawyer. Do you have specific issues with the ACL, or is this a general "anything that smacks of a legal issue is sufficient to prevent use"? I assume the latter...