From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,effb80d4bb7716dd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com>
Subject: Re: Wanted: Ada STL.  Reward: Ada's Future
Date: 1999/02/04
Message-ID: <79cc3q$mms$1@remarQ.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 440599886
References: <790f4q$3l@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
 <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902010909330.26626-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990201214336.46206A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
 <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902020951180.15761-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <36B856E4.D921C1D@bton.ac.uk>
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990204161923.93148A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@remarQ.com
X-Trace: 918139834 Y6JRGRJUHDE9DC640C usenet80.supernews.com
Organization: Software Arts & Sciences
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ehud Lamm wrote in message ...
<snip>
>If I understood the original question on this thred - it was about
SOME
>libray LIKE the C++ STL for Ada. Supplying things like sets and
lists. We
>started by dicussing which of these featurees are really needed, but
soon
>slipped to discussing proting the STL. We somehow missed the obvious
>question which is "Can we do something better or functionally
equivalent,
>but different - in Ada."


Why not have the Ada community "standardize" on the the free Ada 95
Booch Components?  Specifically, expanding them after the core from
the C++ version is completed?


---
Pat Rogers                          Training & Development in:
http://www.classwide.com    Deadline Schedulability Analysis
progers@acm.org                 Software Fault Tolerance
(281)648-3165                       Real-Time/OO Languages