From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,de40179562eb508d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e26g2000vbz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: AdaMagica Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A scapegoat once again :( Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 03:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <79946a77-e019-4fb4-b70b-accacc7d1f2e@e26g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> References: <9b0df7c4-e934-44ad-b388-19174df51343@r20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <9f503be5-2fd3-4650-b4c6-7ca707882e70@f11g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <7a09a4c3-2b88-460c-9dc9-f4e248761eb5@f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.156.44.178 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1306231891 25287 127.0.0.1 (24 May 2011 10:11:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e26g2000vbz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.156.44.178; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESRCNK X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19403 Date: 2011-05-24T03:11:31-07:00 List-Id: On 24 Mai, 09:41, Rick wrote: > While I share the sense of righteous indignation coming through the > postings in this thread, I cannot help but feel that they are wasted. > After all, postings on this group preach to the converted. > > I would be much happier if these comments were getting to the people > responsible for publishing the idiocy which instigated this > conversation. =A0Getting to the Editors who allow their staff to write > unchallenged drivel would have a much more profound effect. > > Now we have the issue, who do we write to? There are a lot of comments on that page, and in fact a few from people who know what they are talking about. Especially EmbeddedSwEng. But will this Shane McGlaun read the comments, let alone forward them to the idiots involved?