From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f0b2f174ad085de X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com Subject: Re: tasking in Ada and Annex D question Date: 1999/02/02 Message-ID: <797hoc$j3v$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 439832513 References: <793jl9$hf@drn.newsguy.com> <7963h1$a6h$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x6.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 02 18:56:17 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 1999-02-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , rracine@draper.com (Roger Racine) wrote: > In article <7963h1$a6h$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com writes: > I re-read the Annex and can find nothing to support your > contention that it requires run till blocked semantics, > with your definition of "blocked". It seems that "task > dispatching points" are completely implementation defined > (D.2.2.18). Well I am of course talking about FIFO_Within_Priorities. If you don't specify the dispatching policy, then of course it is undefined. But FWP is the only defined policy in the RM, and it most definitely requires run till blocked (and whether IO is blocking or not is of course implementation defined). -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own