From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Xref: utzoo comp.realtime:770 comp.lang.ada:4075 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!lph From: lph@sei.cmu.edu (Larry Howard) Newsgroups: comp.realtime,comp.lang.ada Subject: Hartstone Benchmark Results Report Available Keywords: real-time, performance, evaluation, compiler Message-ID: <7959@fy.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 23 Jul 90 21:00:43 GMT Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University (Software Engineering Institute), Pgh, PA List-Id: The Software Engineering Institute, Real-Time Embedded Systems Testbed (REST) Project, has conducted an evaluation of seven Ada compilation systems, for three embedded processors and two non-embedded systems, using its Hartstone benchmark. A technical report has been produced in which the characteristics and expected behavior of the benchmark are described, actual results are presented and analyzed, and the lessons learned about the compilers and processors, and the benchmark itself, are described. The report is entitled "Hartstone Benchmark Results and Analysis, Version 1.0" (CMU/SEI-90-TR-07) and is being made available to the public at no charge. The document is currently available electronically in PostScript (via anonymous ftp) and will be available in hardcopy in a week or two. The size is rather large, 162 pages (497223 bytes). Requests, as well as inquires concerning Hartstone (which is also available free of charge) should be sent to: REST Transition Services Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Internet: hartstone-info@sei.cmu.edu The selection of target processors and compilation systems for evaluation was determined by their availability in our testbed. Nothing in the report should be taken as an endorsement of, or indictment of, a particular product. The embedded processors evaluated were: . Intel iSBC 386/116-M02 board (16 MHz i80386 CPU, 16 MHz i80387 math co-processor, 2 Mbytes of RAM, and 64 Kbyte cache) . Fairchild SBC-50 board (MIL-STD-1750A Instruction Set Architecture, 15 MHz CPU, and 128 Kbytes of RAM) . Motorola MVME133A board (20 MHz MC68020 CPU, 20 MHz MC68881 floating-point co-processor, 1 Mbyte of RAM, and 256 byte instruction cache) The non-embedded systems evaluated were: . A DEC MicroVAX 3200 running VMS 5.3-1 . A Rational R1000, Series 200, Model 20, running the Delta 1 release of the Rational Environment The compilers for the embedded targets evaluated were: . DDC-I DACS-80386PM VAX/VMS - i80386, release 4.3 . SD-Scicon XD Ada VAX/VMS - MC68020, version 1.0 . Tartan Ada VMS/1750A, version 2.14 . TeleSoft TeleGen2 VAX/VMS - MC68020, release 3.22a . Verdix VADS VAX/VMS - MC68020, version 5.7 The compilers for the non-embedded systems evaluated were: . DEC VAX Ada 2.1 . Rational Environment, Delta 1 release Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense.