From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,686004ab0e5b4e75
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pascal Obry" <p.obry@der.edf.fr>
Subject: Re: ada-mode missing syntax checking
Date: 1999/02/01
Message-ID: <793r51$7u3$1@cf01.edf.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 439303068
References: <F6FH5n.2L@jvdsys.stuyts.nl> <m3socr6pr6.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: EDF
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Matthew Heaney a �crit dans le message ...
>jerry@jvdsys.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk) writes:
>
>> The new ada-mode (well, gnat-mode would be a better name) is quite nice,
>> I find the project facility especially handy.
>>
>> However, what I am really missing is the ada-check-syntax (C-c C-v)
command.
>> Although the keys are defined in adamode.el, the implementation of it
seems
>> to have gone missing.
>>
>> Since I use this command a lot (to do a quick check for stupid and not so
>> stupid errors) while programming, I wonder if anyone knows how to put
this
>> command back in.
>
>
>Actually, I never do just syntax checking.  Instead, I prefer to use
>gnatf, to do a (very) fast compile without generating any object code.
>

gnatf does not exist with GNAT 3.11.

Pascal.