From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:19cf:: with SMTP id
 198-v6mr5851250ioz.130.1524503922337;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:73c9:: with SMTP id m9-v6mr808288otk.9.1524503922205;
 Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!f63-v6no3190090itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni3063itb.0!nntp.google.com!f63-v6no3190087itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f2cc5db4-1abf-4a4c-92ed-089e0e7d6d21@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=73.205.150.94;
 posting-account=Ru7E4QoAAAC_HiQ2D8LjZ7rh1mbTNcVn
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.205.150.94
References: <f2cc5db4-1abf-4a4c-92ed-089e0e7d6d21@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7935e886-41da-4353-94cf-bb5db79d18b4@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Using the "Terminated" aspect for a task passed to a generic
From: NiGHTS <nights@unku.us>
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:18:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1770
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1672407731
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51683
Date: 2018-04-23T10:18:41-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Thank you all for your help. These are some really interesting ideas.=20

I was thinking about my problem out-of-the-box and felt it would be an effe=
ctive implementation to make a package including a task interface rather th=
an a generic package passing a task. I realized that the task probably shou=
ld not be defined separately from the WD package and should instead be part=
 of the same inherited package.

To simplify code organization is in itself a bug fix.

I appreciate your quick responses and I have learned a few things as well. =
Thank you again!