From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d4b0becf481d4760 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.addix.net!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.enertel.nl!nntpfeed-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net!lightspeed.eweka.nl!feeder.news-service.com!post.news-service.com!news1.surfino.com!not-for-mail Message-Id: <79139567.fbXP2GMcGD@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: Programming language popularity ranking Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Reply-To: martin@krischik.com Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:36:09 +0100 References: Organization: None User-Agent: KNode/0.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@surfino.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.169.148.166 (83.169.148.166) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:00:18 +0100 X-Trace: cf3224207d6e2f60c310303374 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8184 Date: 2005-02-07T21:36:09+01:00 List-Id: Manuel G. R. wrote: > Please, check this language popularity ranking: > http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe_index/tekst.htm > > Of course, I know this kind of rankings are not vey credible. Well this one counts "Ada programming" on google - fairly easy to cheat. As soon as I found out about that ranking I made shure that all Programming:Ada pages on wikibooks have that text now ;-). And there are 97 right now (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Category:Ada_programming_language). For you spanish wikibook it is of corse more difficult to add the english text "Ada programming". > Ada is in position 19. I don't know if it is close to reality, but I > suspect about those five red down arrows. Do you see that shrinking in > Ada popularity, or should we disregard the ranking? We lost 5 positions - over a year - and that is indeed bad. When I did a "Ada tutorial" research for http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Ada:Tutorials I noticed that a lot of tutorials have become off line which might account for the change. > Are there other rankings to compare? Would be interesting to know. Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net http://www.ada.krischik.com