From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,158487271641b6d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Gnat 3.11 whinings Date: 1999/01/27 Message-ID: <78na8i$204$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 437440666 References: <78kus9$4nv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <78l2qq$845$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <1999Jan26.163956.1@eisner> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x15.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jan 27 15:10:19 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-01-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <1999Jan26.163956.1@eisner>, Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote: > In article <78l2qq$845$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, dennison@telepath.com writes: > > > To make matters worse, we have the site-lisp directory installed on a > > shared drive with everyone's emacs configuration pointing to it. So now > > whenever any developer decides to install gnat...wham! There goes our > > site-start again. > > That sounds like a good argument for file protection (and developers not > running with privileges enabled by default). As has been hinted at in a previous thread, we aren't really into draconian measures around here. I may technicly be the "owner" of the site-start.el file, but developers here are allowed (and *encouraged*) to put items of their own creation in the site-start if they will be of general use (a rather important "if"). It would seriously violate our team spirit, plus create more work for me, if I were to start acting as "emperor" of the group configuration files. In a larger group this setup would probably be a nightmare. But we only have about 8 developers who all sit within earshot of each other, and it seems to work well for us. For instance, one developer created an elisp routine to convert UML specifications into Ada package specs... T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own