From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dec0a6ed5b5044de
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bill_1@nospam.com
Subject: Re: Code portability question
Date: 1999/01/23
Message-ID: <78c4p3$4or@drn.newsguy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 435952634
References: <36A94B78.963F3215@wvu.edu> <36A9849C.A9FE01E4@rocketmail.com>
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://www.newsguy.com]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-01-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <36A9849C.A9FE01E4@rocketmail.com>, Corey says...
>
> 
>It is possible to write Ada95 code that doesn't port easily to another machine.
>A simple example would be code that relies on the byte order of the
>machine to be big endian, and the machine to which you are porting is
>little endian order. 

yes, but the problem was a compile time errors the poster complained 
about, not run-time problems.

I agree with you, more info is needed to understand the problem was.

Bill.