From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,de7c66b71e353e40
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Valued procedures
Date: 1999/01/21
Message-ID: <787ogn$shr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 435265161
References: <786pfu$1vb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x14.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 21 17:35:20 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 1999-01-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <786pfu$1vb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
  dmitry6243@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I do not want to restart this weary thread again. Just a
> question: was the following alternative (which seems to
> be a good compromise with rigouristic
> point of view) ever considered:

If you don't want to restart a weary thread, first go to
the dejanews archives and thoroughly research the old ones
first :-).

Yes of course something like this was considered, and no it
does not work for many reasons, see the old thread to
understand why not!

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own