From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java
Date: 1999/01/20
Message-ID: <785fo3$thj$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 434913608
References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net>
 <tz5n2.4608$TO5.129375@ptah.visi.com> <369DDDC3.FDE09999@sea.ericsson.se>
 <369e309a.32671759@news.demon.co.uk> <369F1D39.64A65BC1@sea.ericsson.se>
 <369f81a9.31040093@news.demon.co.uk> <77ommt$9bo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <77vhjf$nn9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <77vld9$qvg$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <YkGBP4MNXb2t-pn2-bjzMwxf6POdh@localhost> <782rp0$kn6$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <6Oap2.16170$MW1.4028@news2.giganews.com> <783nnb$s9c@drn.newsguy.com>
 <784qvi$a0a$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <78549k$iqv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x4.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jan 20 20:53:27 1999 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 1999-01-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <78549k$iqv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
  robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> In article <784qvi$a0a$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> The GNAT style rules are as follows, and yes everyone
> at ACT follows them:
>
>   function x (y : integer) return Boolean is
>      ... declarations
>   begin
>      ... statements
>   end x;
>
> Above is used if it fits on one line
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Good rule.

>
>   function x
>     (Hello : Integer;
>      Goodbye : Integer)
>      return    Integer

I do have to admit, I see no reason why following this guideline should be a
big problem for anyone (except perhaps the leading ';' devotees). I would
have a tough time at first not lining up the ':'s. I'm pretty used to the
implicit "in"s being supplied too.

T.E.D.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own