From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 146b77,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid146b77,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java Date: 1999/01/14 Message-ID: <77l4cg$5q4$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 432551176 References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net> <369CBAED.20BE91CA@pwfl.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x3.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 14 16:01:27 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.vxworks,comp.lang.java X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , nobody@0.0 (Peter) wrote: > Personally, I have not encountered any commercial applications or > operating systems written in Java. Those domains would probably > constitute non-throw-away projects (though some of them should be thrown > away). There are many other kinds of non-throw-away projects though. > That doesn't mean they don't exist. I know of at least one communications company (Vivyx) that does 90% of their systems development work in Java. I suspect there are many more out there. T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own