From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 146b77,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid146b77,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dennison@telepath.com Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java Date: 1999/01/14 Message-ID: <77l3ib$4s1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 432547255 References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net> <369e09ff.3246197@news.supernews.co.uk> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x3.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 14 15:47:26 1999 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.vxworks,comp.lang.java X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 1999-01-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <369e09ff.3246197@news.supernews.co.uk>, bob@lintilla.demon.co.uk (Bob Cousins) wrote: > In comp.arch.embedded, Leszek Sczaniecki wrote: > > >We are about to start a big project, something about 250k lines of code. > >We are going to stick to it for next several years. We would like to > >make an educated choice for the underlying language. This language > >should... > > I won't comment on the language issues, apart from saying that it does not > appear that Java will meet you requirements. Either of Ada or C++ will easily > meet your requirements. Not true. C++ has no language support for concurrency. That leaves Ada. T.E.D. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own