From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e1d728aa632a5b94 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr18477719pbc.8.1341750955557; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni11158pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: rodakay@internode.on.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ? Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 05:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <77fa1487-e67d-4660-9073-f4edec4295bf@googlegroups.com> References: <19yhfqeqkm9kc$.fcax7yetctwy$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.101.201.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1341750955 7879 127.0.0.1 (8 Jul 2012 12:35:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 12:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de In-Reply-To: <19yhfqeqkm9kc$.fcax7yetctwy$.dlg@40tude.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=150.101.201.124; posting-account=pBdvJAoAAAAbTiQ-L1tpxD99i_UttsrJ User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-07-08T05:34:01-07:00 List-Id: On Sunday, 8 July 2012 16:53:30 UTC+10, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > > Yes, of course. We are heavily using them in our projects. Thank you Dmitry, that's most encouraging. It did seem unlikely that I could be the only person using interface types :). (Probably, I am the only person using them poorly, though ;) ). > > You should post a small example illustrating the case. Yes, indeed. I will try to set up a minimal test case in the next day or so.