From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!dik
From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Limited Use Clause
Message-ID: <7786@boring.cwi.nl>
Date: 18 Dec 88 14:48:11 GMT
References: <4168@enea.se>
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4168@enea.se> sommar@enea.se (Erland Sommarskog) writes:
 > Of course a matter of taste, but I think mentioning a name and getting 
 > all subprograms with that name is a very non-Ada way of approaching
 > things.
But exactly the same happens with pragma INLINE.
-- 
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
INTERNET   : dik@cwi.nl
BITNET/EARN: dik@mcvax