From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,714e82e4cfdb8641 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.36.6 with SMTP id m6mr12105633pbj.4.1322242788249; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:48 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni17206pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!cu3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ed Falis Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AUnit: ambigous name, again Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:47 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <777653d6-6010-4c23-b0e5-83f2f324f2b2@cu3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.184.72.109 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1322242788 22609 127.0.0.1 (25 Nov 2011 17:39:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: cu3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.184.72.109; posting-account=AbUV6AoAAABCszcq2uwr3Y_xpLTcXcln User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: UHALERCNK X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.52,gzip(gfe) Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19172 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2011-11-25T09:39:47-08:00 List-Id: On Nov 25, 12:16=A0pm, Simon Wright wrote: > "Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57)" writes: > > > Ada is already known to be an ambiguous name, standing for too many > > things in different countries. > > > Just discovered AUnit suffers from the same too > >http://aunit.sourceforge.net/ > > That's for AspectJ. > > > I am tempted to drop them a mail and suggest to rename their stuff > > into something like ajunit instead. > > > Should I or not ? > > Almost 7 years too late, I'd say! Mind you, the last revision seems to > have been in April 2005. Perhaps it's perfect. 46 downloads in the last > year. Right, I noticed that too. This is the second time someone has adopted the name. Guess it's inevitable over time. - Ed