From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f49c8f164340c377 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody From: Jean-Pierre Rosen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Current status of Ada? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:43:30 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: <7744bf.vg4.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1188403285 22031 195.25.228.57 (29 Aug 2007 16:01:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:01:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1593 Date: 2007-08-29T17:43:30+02:00 List-Id: Ed Falis a �crit : > Richard, you misinterpreted the sense of my comment: I don't see how > anyone could have interpreted Paige's memo as anything other than DoD > walking away from Ada. > What the memo really said was that the most cost-effective language in the long term should be chosen. It intended to be quite favorable to Ada, but the only part that people saw was that Ada was no more mandated. -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr