From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9de425d0eee7b58 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: sjw Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does GNAT GPL 2010 have C++? Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <771f70fb-40bc-41df-a1fa-a363601a5cab@c16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> References: <4cd34172-9a48-4679-b4c6-ebf3793e3328@p22g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <1c84d9d4-2d55-4a73-8fb5-fb060e0f55c1@l17g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <93a65872-09bc-43e0-8e89-802608943810@s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <27c59fd2-dfc0-4033-bdc2-da2d4a28c336@w4g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <0f2fc836-7b85-422e-b535-24d0f6077b2b@p24g2000pra.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.13 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1284722504 682 127.0.0.1 (17 Sep 2010 11:21:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.13; posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14145 Date: 2010-09-17T04:21:44-07:00 List-Id: On Sep 17, 9:50=A0am, Jerry wrote: > On Sep 16, 4:29=A0pm, Simon Wright wrote: > > > It's a middling-complex job, which I've done quite a few times now, and > > am about to start for GNAT GPL 2010 now you've suggested it -- but only > > for Snow Leopard, I'm afraid. > > That would be awesome. In that case, I would just move to 10.6 and > figure out whatever other issues there would be with my workflow. > > Do you normally include Fortran or other languages in your builds? 'normally' I'd just include Ada & C. But I've recently needed to include Fortran (for the math extension project, to generate test data sets), so C++ shouldn't be a huge problem. I think the 'make check' part might be interesting, I gather it takes a loong time for C++ ...